What is a legal hold and how do you get out of it?

No, it isn’t a wrestling hold, like the sleeper,

(sorry, it was the only image with the proper license I could find), but it is something that you need to take very seriously.

For instance, the blockbuster jury award issued in the ongoing patent litigation between Apple and Samsung certainly caught everyone’s attention.  The jury concluded that Samsung infringed on several Apple patents and awarded Apple $1.05 billion in damages.

One important lesson you should learn from this case is the importance of a litigation hold and the consequences of failing to uphold your obligations.

Whenever a person or company is involved in litigation or has notice that it is likely to be involved in litigation the law imposes an obligation—called a “legal hold”—to preserve evidence that might be relevant for use at an eventual trial or during the discovery phase of the case.

The evidence that needs to be preserved includes any kind of physical evidence, such as documents, electronic data, physical objects, drawings, contracts, manuals, photographs, samples, prototypes, and any other documents or things that could relate to the case would be potentially relevant. It is important to recognize that electronic data is included in the “legal hold.” This includes email communications and all other electronic data that might be relevant.  

If you fail to hold onto the evidence, the judge can order that an “adverse inference” be made against you.   For example, a jury could be instructed that because you failed to preserve evidence the jury could infer that the evidence would help prove the other side of the case.

This is what happened to Samsung. While it may not have directly impacted the verdict, it certainly did not help their case either.

Other companies have had this happen to them when they neglected to disable an automatic deletion program of emails after a specific period of time.  Even though nobody sorted through the emails before they were automatically deleted, the judge ordered that the absence of the emails could be used by the opposing party (ouch!), even if there were no emails that actually had any negative information or evidence.  The party that failed to preserve the emails would have an adverse inference taken against it anyway.

Here is your take-away: if you are involved in a lawsuit you have a legal obligation to take all reasonably necessary steps to preserve potential evidence, including emails, for as long as the lawsuit might last.  This obligation begins before the lawsuit is filed! (i.e., as soon as you might be reasonable noticed that a lawsuit is likely). 

ANYONE in the company that has potentially relevant evidence is subject to this “legal hold.” The company has the obligation to advise all relevant employees to preserve emails and other evidence, and to monitor compliance to make sure that they follow through with the “legal hold.”

How I Can Help

If your company, or someone you know, has recieved notice of a patent lawsuit filed against you, I can help you defend yourself.   Please contact me for a free 30 minute consultation by sending me an email or call TOLL FREE at 1-855-UR IDEAS (1-855-874-3327) and ask for Norman.

– Ex astris, scientia –

I am and avid amateur astronomer and intellectual property attorney.  As a former Chief Petty Officer in the U.S. Navy, I am a proud member of the Armed Service Committee of the Los Angeles County Bar Association working to aid all active duty and veterans in our communities.  Connect with me on Google +

Norman

Will the real Durantula please rock a three pointer.

Sports stars continue to be magnets for intellectual property lawsuits.  Kevin Durant of the Oklahoma Thunder is in an ongoing trademark infringement lawsuit.  A heavy-metal musician named Mark Durante claims the basketball player is illegally using his nickname, “Durantula.”

http://www.trbimg.com/img-4fe329e4/turbine/chi-kevin-durant-sued-by-mchenry-80s-metal-gui-001/600

The lawsuit, filed in the federal court for the Northern District of Illinois, names both Durant and Nike as defendants. Durante contends he registered the “Durantula” trademark 1993 and has subsequently used the nickname as his “on-stage and performance persona” and to market “music, recordings, apparel, t-shirts, guitars, and related merchandise.”

https://i1.wp.com/images.free-extras.com/pics/n/nike-705.jpg

Durante also alleges that the basketball star has ignored his repeated demands to stop using the trademark. While representative for Durant contend the basketball start does not use the term as a nickname, the suit alleges that he uses the nickname on his Twitter account and sells basketballs signed “Durantula” through his website. Nike also named its Durant-inspired shoe design “Durantula,” according to the complaint.

While Durante may have registered the trademark and used the nickname for twenty years, he will still have to show the likelihood of confusion. Given that the two “Durantulas” come from very different worlds, it is arguable that consumers can easily tell the difference.

How Can I Help?

If you need help to file a trademark, or to protect an existing trademark, or know someone that can use my help, please contact me for a free 30 minute consultation by sending me an email or call TOLL FREE at 1-855-UR IDEAS (1-855-874-3327) and ask for Norman.

– Ex astris, scientia –

I am and avid amateur astronomer and intellectual property attorney.  As a former Chief Petty Officer in the U.S. Navy, I am a proud member of the Armed Service Committee of the Los Angeles County Bar Association working to aid all active duty and veterans in our communities.  Connect with me on Google +

Norman

Are Emoticons Patentable?

There is an ongoing patent dispute between Apple and Samsung Electronics, even after the latest verdict. The lawsuits span the globe and cover a number of cell phone and tablet technologies.

The subject of the latest dispute made us smile—and by that we mean :-). Yes, you guessed it. The smartphone rivals are reportedly now locked in a patent dispute over emoticons. }:-(.

As reported by the Los Angeles Times, Samsung owns a patent on smartphone use of emoticons. In fact, a patent for an “emoticon input method for mobile terminals” was granted in Europe way back in 2000.

In the latest lawsuit, Samsung is challenging the way in which iPhones enter emoticons on the handset’s screen. As detailed by the LA Times, Samsung specifically alleges that the iPhone’s Japanese emoticon keyboard infringes on its patent. When users activate the Japanese keyboard, they also activate an emoticon menu and, with one touch, can add multiple complex emoticons.

While the subject of the latest patent lawsuit is amusing :o, it will likely have serious consequences in this growing patent war, and that makes us a bit sad 😦

If you need help to protect your ideas 😉 , or know someone that can use my help ()-(), please contact me for a free 30 minute consultation at nvantreeck@usip.com or call TOLL FREE at 1-855-UR IDEAS (1-855-874-3327) and ask for Norman.

– Ex astris, scientia –

I am and avid amateur astronomer and intellectual property attorney.  As a former Chief Petty Officer in the U.S. Navy, I am a proud member of the Armed Service Committee of the Los Angeles County Bar Association working to aid all active duty and veterans in our communities.  Connect with me on Google +

Norman